There’s no doubt that Wingard and Barrett had set themselves a difficult challenge to undertake. It would be interesting to chat with someone who hasn’t seen The Blair Witch Project and therefore not been consumed or tainted by the hyperbole that surrounded that film and get their take on it.
#The blair witch project 2016 rating movie#
Perhaps by viewing the original movie and being so affected by it, my observations and responses to Blair Witch are automatically going to be tainted. The filmmakers also try to throw in all the latest mod-cons to make it feel more like a bunch of present day kids venturing into the woods, armed with drones and the like.īut it does feel a little forced, especially as for me, it treads a little too closely to the original to make it stand apart from its predecessor. So, it’s easy to forgive this little quibble and give in to the suspension of disbelief. There are elements within the movie that feels a little disjointed with the timelines a little, but hey, that’s one of the anomalies within this universe that you could use your BS around, with the Witch’s strange effect on time and space. Yes – I’m looking at you Paranormal Activity.ĭespite this, Wingard and Barrett chose to explore and set the Blair Witch 18 years after the original (and rightfully ignoring Blair Witch 2: Book of Shadows, which I think everyone can agree was a complete dud). Is this over-saturation of the sun-genre partly to blame?
![the blair witch project 2016 rating the blair witch project 2016 rating](https://parentpreviews.com/images/made/legacy-pics/blair-witch_668_330_80_int_s_c1.jpg)
The premise was to take a look into what the Blair Witch mythology brought to the screens back in 1999 by Eduardo Sanchez and Daniel Myrick with The Blair Witch Project, a film that sent shock waves through the horror movie scene and the cinema industry with its bold choice of storytelling through found footage.įound footage was a medium which at the time hadn’t been as widely explored, unlike today where it seems like everyone under the sun has attempted it, with nowhere near the success. The big question really though is did the movie fall victim to the Blair Witch curse?
![the blair witch project 2016 rating the blair witch project 2016 rating](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8A-lNEolXsA/maxresdefault.jpg)
There are also hints that the film’s fragmented narratives are more multi-layered than they first appear.I’D REALLY LOVE to get Adam Wingard and Simon Barrett’s school of thought on the aftermath of this movies release.įans and critics alike didn’t warm to the film and because of this, Blair Witch is deemed a failure. Barrett, meanwhile, creates compelling explanations for those trademark stick figures, and Rustin Parr’s insistence that his victims stand in the corner. Amid the usual found-footage longueurs and sudden jolts, Wingard finds time for snatches of genuine tenderness, such as when Lisa and James cling together, terrified, their breath fogging the lens. So why bother?įrom the chilly grief of A Horrible Way to Die (2010) to the visual dazzle of V/H/S (2012), Wingard and Barrett are one of the most reliable pairings in modern horror. Indeed, bar an overwhelming sense of one-upmanship – pus in boots rather than snot in camera, massive stick figures as well as tiny ones, a creepy witch house with (structurally unwise) tunnels under the basement – we might as well be watching a remake.
![the blair witch project 2016 rating the blair witch project 2016 rating](https://crypticrock.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/blair-witch-slide.jpg)
While the original (unseen) Blair Witch fooled (some) viewers into believing she was real, the 2016 version even has her own stunt double. As a glitchy DV Lionsgate logo reminds us: we simply can’t trust images. By now, everyone knows the legend of 17th-Century witch Elly Kedward and 1940s child killer Rustin Parr, and all the characters immediately deconstruct everything they see.